Peter Salovey President | Yale University
Peter Salovey President | Yale University
A recent study led by Kelly Shue, a professor of finance at Yale SOM, has shed light on the impact of personal financial incentives on CEOs' decisions regarding corporate social responsibility (CSR) efforts. Shue, along with researchers Ing-Haw Cheng and Harrison Hong, found that CEOs tend to reduce their CSR initiatives when their personal income or standing with shareholders is at risk.
Shue emphasized the role of CEOs as human beings with personal preferences and motivations. She pointed out that CEOs may prioritize maximizing profits when their own money is on the line, leading to a decrease in CSR activities. According to Shue, "It’s much easier to do good when you’re spending other people’s money."
The study utilized various tests to examine CEO behavior in relation to CSR efforts. One test involved analyzing the impact of the 2003 Dividend Tax Cut on CEO decision-making. The researchers observed that CEOs who owned a moderate amount of stock in their companies were more inclined to prioritize increasing the businesses’ value over CSR activities following the tax cut.
Additionally, the study compared firms where shareholder proposals narrowly passed to those where proposals narrowly failed. The findings revealed that companies with passed proposals experienced slower growth in CSR initiatives compared to those with failed proposals. Shue explained that well-governed firms often focus on maximizing profits, leading CEOs to negotiate firmly against labor and prioritize financial gains over social responsibility.
Shue's research challenges the notion of CEOs solely as profit-maximizing entities, highlighting their social preferences and the influence of personal financial interests on CSR decisions. She concluded, "It’s easier to be generous when it’s not your own money."
The study underscores the complex interplay between personal incentives and corporate social responsibility within organizations, providing valuable insights into the behavior of CEOs in balancing financial interests with social impact.